Quantcast
Viewing latest article 4
Browse Latest Browse All 4

Full Text Search Optimization

Hi, I am having a hard time trying to optimize a **Full Text Search** ( FTS ) on a ~1 billion rows table ( around 18Gb of reserved space used ). The main problem seems the amount of rows returned and not the search itself. For example, when searching for "*sales*" i got **1811766** rows and it takes **22secs**, when searching for "*pineapple*" i got **9** rows and it takes **0.1secs** **So far i tryed the following tips and optimizations:** - Separeted Disk with its own raid system ( low IO concurrency ) - clustered index on the FTS key. - timestamp column to enhance incremental update ( even if i usually do full updates at night ) - daily table index and FTS rebuild - using CONTAINSTALE instead of CONTAINS - config: max full-text crawl range set to the number of cpu cores ( 4x4 = 16 ) - config: resource_usage set to 5 ( from 3 ) - config: ft crawl bandwidth (max) set to 0 ( unlimited ) - config: ft notify bandwidth (max) set to 0 ( unlimited ) - Config: max server memory set to 44Gb ( 4Gb left to SO + fdhost.exe ) I am running on a win2003 with 4x quad-core CPUs, 48GbRam. SQL 2005 SP3, with all cumulative updates ( except last one or two ). I have very few bottlenecks right now, cpu never allways under 80%, our new fiber channel solved most IO problems, and Memory usage also seems ok ( Page Life Expectancy never goes too down, and buffer cache hit ratio is 98+ ). **These are some of my sources of information so far:** - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc917695.aspx - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms142560.aspx - http://sqlserverpedia.com/wiki/FTS_-_Performance **Question: What else should i do to get a faster response time ?** Any help is appreciated, Thanks.

Viewing latest article 4
Browse Latest Browse All 4

Trending Articles